ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

Tesla’s NACS offer refuted by CharIN - CCS is the global standard

  • Post your comment
  • Comments (4)

Max McDee, 30 November 2022

Misc Tesla

It took CharIN (Charging Interface Initiative) a few weeks to respond to Tesla’s offer for its NACS charging solution to be adapted as the global standard. As a reminder, Tesla opened up its charging technology to any company wishing to use it and is in the process of establishing it as the charging standard for North America - hence the re-branding to NACS or North America Charging Standard.

CharIN was set up in 2015 to unify global EV charging standards and propose one universal solution. The result is the CCS, the familiar bulky connector that took years to develop and is globally recognized by the majority of automakers. Tesla’s solution may look better, but the company’s offer for everyone to use it comes too late, the association believes.

NACS v CCS NACS v CCS

CharIN issued a strongly worded response, in which it reminded Tesla that the company itself was a member of the CharIN organization and it was supposed to act like one. Tesla was reminded that it should work together with the other 300+ members to accelerate adoption of CCS as it agreed to, rather than promoting its own solution.

While there is no question that Tesla’s charging cable and connectors are much sleeker and arguably easier to use, that alone hardly gives the company a reason to try and derail the progress on the CCS standard. The timing of Tesla’s offer should be questioned - why didn't it offer its own solution in 2015 or the years that followed? Why did it never try to convince anyone to use its standard, on the contrary - it kept its technology well guarded?

The answer is quite simple - it’s business. It seems Tesla never expected the CCS to take over so quickly and it was banking on its own charging infrastructure to be the dominant one purely because it was first to the market. With the CCS now used in more than 50 electric car models, Tesla’s NACS has fallen back to only 4 of its own cars. There are 61,000 CCS public chargers worldwide compared to Tesla’s 40,000 Superchargers. Those gaps are getting bigger really fast.

CCS adapter for NACS CCS adapter for NACS

Tesla missed a licensing opportunity, it is as simple as that. Now it is trying to catch up and risks disrupting the industry, which again would play into its hand. It is nothing more than a tactic to gain a foothold in the lucrative market of EV charging. Again - Tesla’s solution definitely may look better, but to have the CCS changed to NACS globally would mean years of delays in infrastructure rollout and huge costs to automakers.

Will Tesla convince automakers for the NACS to be used in North America only? That’s quite possible, the current protectionist trends are very strong and with customer support the automakers may not have as much choice in the matter as they wish they had. It’s an interesting topic to follow, but it is a shame it has nothing to do with customers getting a better deal - it is simply a play for market domination.

Source

Related articles
  • Vivo's upcoming X Fold5 wants to tear down walls with new car integration Vivo's upcoming X Fold5 wants to tear down walls with new car integration
  • China's automakers sidestep EU tariffs, doubling market share China's automakers sidestep EU tariffs, doubling market share
  • China's EV market booms as North America hits the brakes China's EV market booms as North America hits the brakes
  • Charging EVs is most expensive in Germany, cheapest in Türkiye, EU study finds Charging EVs is most expensive in Germany, cheapest in Türkiye, EU study finds

Reader comments

R
  • Red Silurian
  • 0mK
  • 27 Jun 2023

NACS simply wouldn't work in Europe or anywhere else the Type2 CCS is the standard. Type 2 CCS is far superior to both NACS and Type 1 CCS. China similarly want their own standard. NACS is unlikely to spread any further than its current borders ...

  • Reply
T
  • Todd
  • q$a
  • 09 Jun 2023

First Ford adapts NACS, now GM. Looks like CharIN may be the ones to to be reminded that standards need to follow economic realities, not the other way around.

  • Reply
T
  • TechWorld
  • AZY
  • 09 Jun 2023

100% agreed. In North America, Ford and GM have now signed up to NACS - a big win all round, for consumers, Ford, GM, Tesla and the industry as a whole. I wonder what it would take for EU commission to delve into the possibilities of a more practical...

  • Reply
  • Read all comments
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 4

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Genesis
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Ford
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Jaguar
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • Mini
  • MG
  • Vinfast
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • [..]

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelXiaomi
    YU7 Max
  • ModelNissan
    Leaf 75kWh
  • ModelTesla
    Model S Plaid
  • ModelNissan
    Micra EV 52kWh
  • ModelTesla
    Model X Plaid
  • ModelGenesis
    GV60 Performance AWD

Featured

  • Here's a breakdown of the cost of an EV battery Here's a breakdown of the cost of an EV battery
  • Peugeot e-208 tops 84 cars in ADAC's 2024 Ecotest, Model 3 ranks fourth Peugeot e-208 tops 84 cars in ADAC's 2024 Ecotest, Model 3 ranks fourth
  • Why do modern vehicles beep so much while driving? Why do modern vehicles beep so much while driving?
  • Benefits of dedicated EV platforms Benefits of dedicated EV platforms
  • Real-life test reveals how much range EVs lose in the cold Real-life test reveals how much range EVs lose in the cold
ADVERTISEMENTS

Reviews

  • Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic review Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic review
  • Fiat 500e review Fiat 500e review
  • BMW i5 M60 review BMW i5 M60 review
  • Volkswagen ID.4 GTX review Volkswagen ID.4 GTX review

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2025 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com