ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

Tesla's Supercharger struggle - short cables and awkward parking for non-Tesla EVs

  • Post your comment

Max McDee, 10 March 2024

Tesla

Tesla's Supercharger network, once the exclusive domain of its own electric vehicles, is starting to feel a bit crowded. The company's decision to open its chargers to other EV brands has been a boon for electric car adoption, but it's also exposed some design quirks in older Supercharger stations. Namely, the charging cables just aren't long enough to comfortably reach the diverse charging port locations found on non-Tesla EVs.

The result? Some non-Tesla EV drivers are forced to resort to awkward, space-hogging parking maneuvers just to plug in. It's a headache for drivers and highlights Tesla's initial focus on serving the needs of its own vehicle lineup.

Tesla's Supercharger struggle - short cables and awkward parking for non-Tesla EVs

Tesla standardized its charging port location on the left rear of the car – a sensible spot. But with other automakers now accessing Superchargers, it's clear that not everyone shares that design philosophy. Some EVs have ports in the front, others on the sides, creating a geometrical puzzle when it comes to reaching Tesla's stubby V3 Supercharger cables.

Tesla is not blind to this issue. Their website even advises drivers to park over stall lines as necessary. The company's upcoming V4 Superchargers with longer cables will alleviate the issue, but with thousands of V3 stations across the country, it won't be a quick or widespread fix.

Tesla's Supercharger struggle - short cables and awkward parking for non-Tesla EVs

Tesla's answer, at least for now, is an extension cable. The company's support website confirms a NACS-to-NACS (Tesla's connector standard) extension is in the works for future purchase. For those unfamiliar, imagine an extension cord, but for your car's charging port.

This seems like a handy solution, but there's a catch: cost. Tesla hasn't mentioned a price, and anything related to this premium brand is unlikely to be a bargain. Now, drivers of EVs with awkwardly placed ports face buying a potentially expensive accessory just to utilize stations Tesla designed primarily for itself. This could lead to frustrated drivers opting to continue blocking stalls by parking creatively, rather than purchasing an extra cable.

Tesla's Supercharger struggle - short cables and awkward parking for non-Tesla EVs

While the extension cable is a band-aid fix, Tesla's longer-term goal is clear: convince other automakers to follow Tesla's lead on charging port placement. This would create design consistency and eliminate the whole cable length issue. However, don't expect rivals to simply bow to Tesla's preference anytime soon.

It's a fascinating, if slightly messy, chapter in the EV evolution. Tesla's decision to open the Supercharger network is commendable. However, it's clear that ensuring a smooth, hassle-free experience for all EV owners will take some time and creative solutions – hopefully, not all as potentially costly as a specialty extension cable.

Tesla's Supercharger struggle - short cables and awkward parking for non-Tesla EVs

On the side note - the internet is full of NACS extension cables, and a quick search of the busiest online marketplaces returns tens, if not hundreds, of results. Some cost hundreds of dollars, and some come with more wallet-friendly prices. The question is - would you trust the safety of your electric car to a cable with questionable origin?

Via

Related articles
  • The curious case of the unloved Tesla Cybertrucks The curious case of the unloved Tesla Cybertrucks
  • Tesla Cybertruck sales slump continues in Q3 Tesla Cybertruck sales slump continues in Q3
  • New six-seater Model Y gives Tesla China a much-needed sales boost New six-seater Model Y gives Tesla China a much-needed sales boost
  • Tesla's driverless dream inches closer as Cybercab hits the test track Tesla's driverless dream inches closer as Cybercab hits the test track
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 0

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Genesis
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Ford
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Jaguar
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • Mini
  • MG
  • Vinfast
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • [..]

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelCitroen
    e-C5 Aircross Electric 210
  • ModelPorsche
    Cayenne Turbo Electric
  • ModelTesla
    Model Y Standard
  • ModelTesla
    Model 3 Standard
  • ModelPolestar
    3 Performance
  • ModelMercedes
    GLC 400 4MATIC

Featured

  • Polestar 3 edges Tesla Model 3 out in 24 vehicle winter range test Polestar 3 edges Tesla Model 3 out in 24 vehicle winter range test
  • Why DC charging peak power is misleading Why DC charging peak power is misleading
  • Peugeot e-208 tops 84 cars in ADAC's 2024 Ecotest, Model 3 ranks fourth Peugeot e-208 tops 84 cars in ADAC's 2024 Ecotest, Model 3 ranks fourth
  • No, your 800V Hyundai or Kia doesn't charge at 350kW No, your 800V Hyundai or Kia doesn't charge at 350kW
  • NCM, NCA, LFP, solid-state - EV battery chemistry explained NCM, NCA, LFP, solid-state - EV battery chemistry explained
ADVERTISEMENTS

Reviews

  • Tesla Model Y Long Range 2023 review Tesla Model Y Long Range 2023 review
  • BMW i5 M60 review BMW i5 M60 review
  • Mini Cooper SE JCW review Mini Cooper SE JCW review
  • Tesla Model S 75D 2018 used car review Tesla Model S 75D 2018 used car review

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2025 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com