ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

A new study shows how bad touchscreen-centric car controls are for road safety

  • Post your comment

Ro, 17 August 2026

Other

In the last decade or so, screens have become an inseparable part of modern-day vehicles, but at some point, the pendulum has swung a bit too far. Nowadays, drivers are complaining about complicated UI and touch controls to perform simple tasks like adjusting the AC or even changing the radio station. And according to a study conducted by Vi Bilägare, it's not just the drivers. The data shows that screen distractions in a car are becoming worse.

A new study shows how touchscreen-centric car controls are detrimental for road safety

The first study was carried out in 2022 and found that drivers spend a surprising amount of time interacting with the screen while driving. The testing scenario required drivers to adjust the AC settings, change radio stations and alter the display brightness while moving at highway speeds on a closed airfield. Of course, the drivers were asked to get familiar with the car's specific settings before the test in order to replicate a real car owner's experience. The results were measured in the time it took to complete a single task as well as the car's distance traveled while adjusting the said settings.

This year, the same study was conducted with the same exact testing methodology for consistency. In 2022, the average distance traveled while completing tasks was about 2,480 ft, while in 2026, that figure is 2,667 ft. In other words, it took the drivers two extra seconds to complete the same tasks under the same conditions four years later.

Just to put those numbers into context, back in 2005, the Volvo V70 was criticized for having complicated media control buttons and cluttered controls on the dashboard, and the average time for completing these tasks was 945 ft. So it's clear that we have an issue on our hands.

The study found that Mazda was the worst offender, with the CX-60 requiring 3,730 ft to complete all tasks, despite the company advertising safety and ease of use of its infotainment system.

Volvo sits on the other end of the spectrum with a score of 1,591 ft in the same test. Audi is also taking the issue seriously and aims to bring back hardware controls for the most commonly used features. Another way to tackle this is to move the infotainment screen up on the dashboard, which reduces the distraction time for drivers, the study shows.

Source

This article contains localized units and prices. Change settings.
Your choice
Related articles
  • Geely Galaxy TT - another electric sedan from China Geely Galaxy TT - another electric sedan from China
  • The first all-electric BMW iX5 is now official, comes alongside four other powertrain options The first all-electric BMW iX5 is now official, comes alongside four other powertrain options
  • Land Rover readying another full-electric vehicle, likely a Velar successor Land Rover readying another full-electric vehicle, likely a Velar successor
  • Xiaomi is on a roll with another 40,000 sales month Xiaomi is on a roll with another 40,000 sales month
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 0

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Dacia
  • Ford
  • Jeep
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Zeekr
  • Jaguar
  • Mini
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • MG
  • Voyah
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • RAM
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • All brands

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelMercedes
    AMG GT 53 4-Door Coupé 4MATIC+
  • ModelXiaomi
    SkyNomad N90 Max
  • ModelXiaomi
    SkyNomad N70 Pro
  • ModelMercedes
    GLA 350 4Matic
  • ModelVolkswagen
    ID.Cross 155 kW
  • ModelDS
    N°7 AWD Long Range

Featured

  • Why solar panels on cars make no sense (at this point) Why solar panels on cars make no sense (at this point)
  • Why electric cars don't have conventional gearboxes Why electric cars don't have conventional gearboxes
  • Why BMW i3 was ahead of its time Why BMW i3 was ahead of its time
  • Comparison of NEDC, EPA and WLTP cycles Comparison of NEDC, EPA and WLTP cycles
  • Volvo EX90 alternatives - Mercedes EQS SUV 580 and Tesla Model X LR+ Volvo EX90 alternatives - Mercedes EQS SUV 580 and Tesla Model X LR+

Reviews

  • BMW iX3 50 xDrive review BMW iX3 50 xDrive review
  • 2026 Porsche Cayenne Electric: interior, design and features review 2026 Porsche Cayenne Electric: interior, design and features review
  • Alfa Romeo Junior Elettrica Veloce review Alfa Romeo Junior Elettrica Veloce review
  • Lynk & Co 08 review Lynk & Co 08 review
ADVERTISEMENTS

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2026 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com