ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

Tesla is scaling back on gigacasting ambitions

  • Post your comment
  • Comments (2)

Max McDee, 02 May 2024

Tesla

Tesla has reportedly hit the brakes on its groundbreaking gigacasting manufacturing process. Originally intended to create the entire underbody of new Tesla models from a single piece, anonymous sources familiar with the matter suggest the company will instead be opting for a more incremental approach. This news comes amid broader company cutbacks and a strategic shift away from rapid EV production growth and toward autonomous driving technology.

Gigacasting, a cornerstone of Tesla's innovation, simplifies vehicle production substantially. This process uses massive presses to cast large sections of a car's structure in single pieces, replacing the need for numerous smaller parts in traditional car manufacturing. Tesla currently uses gigacasting to create its Model Y and Cybertruck underbodies out of three components.

Tesla is scaling back on gigacasting ambitions

The initial plan for Tesla's next-generation gigacasting process was ambitious – to cast an entire vehicle underbody in one go. This would have streamlined production processes even further, with the potential for significant cost savings. However, it seems Tesla is sticking with its proven three-piece underbody construction technique consisting of two giant front and rear castings and a center section of aluminum and steel for battery storage.

The rationale behind this decision appears to center around cost control in the face of softening demand for EVs globally and heightened competition from other EV makers gaining ground in the market. The focus seems to be on developing autonomous driving technology rather than on increasing its EV production volume.

Tesla is scaling back on gigacasting ambitions

Last month, Tesla reduced its global workforce by over 10%, followed by several high-profile executive departures. These actions mirror the halt in development of its much-anticipated Tesla Model 2, an affordable EV slated for release in 2025 that was supposed to be the first showcasing the new one-piece casting method. In an earnings call last April, CEO Elon Musk hinted at a focus on cost optimization through simplified and accelerated production processes for more budget-friendly cars, although details remained scarce.

The focus on one-piece casting for Tesla's robotaxi program is ongoing. However, the decision to hold back on its consumer car application suggests the technology may still require extensive research and development before large-scale implementation. Automotive manufacturing experts acknowledge the high initial cost and technical complexity associated with gigacasting, especially considering Tesla's history of encountering delays with innovative vehicle launches

Source

Related articles
  • Tesla Cybertruck sales slump continues in Q3 Tesla Cybertruck sales slump continues in Q3
  • New six-seater Model Y gives Tesla China a much-needed sales boost New six-seater Model Y gives Tesla China a much-needed sales boost
  • Tesla's driverless dream inches closer as Cybercab hits the test track Tesla's driverless dream inches closer as Cybercab hits the test track
  • Tesla's new Model Y+ targets 497 miles range in China Tesla's new Model Y+ targets 497 miles range in China

Reader comments

K
  • Kupfernigk
  • 39C
  • 06 May 2024

The one piece gigacasting would probably have made insurance unaffordable due to even a small crash being a writeoff. Volvo had a similar problem at one point with a bidy design that wrote off after minor sill damage. This is why sensible EV buyers...

  • Reply
?
  • Anonymous
  • rRU
  • 03 May 2024

Tesla is scaling back to save its stock. Selling their stock makes money for them, not selling cars.

  • Reply
  • Read all comments
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 2

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Genesis
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Ford
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Jaguar
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • Mini
  • MG
  • Vinfast
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • [..]

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelCitroen
    e-C5 Aircross Electric 210
  • ModelPorsche
    Cayenne Turbo Electric
  • ModelTesla
    Model Y Standard
  • ModelTesla
    Model 3 Standard
  • ModelPolestar
    3 Performance
  • ModelMercedes
    GLC 400 4MATIC

Featured

  • Why solar panels on cars make no sense (at this point) Why solar panels on cars make no sense (at this point)
  • Why DC charging peak power is misleading Why DC charging peak power is misleading
  • Why BMW i3 was ahead of its time Why BMW i3 was ahead of its time
  • Polestar 3 edges Tesla Model 3 out in 24 vehicle winter range test Polestar 3 edges Tesla Model 3 out in 24 vehicle winter range test
  • Benefits of dedicated EV platforms Benefits of dedicated EV platforms
ADVERTISEMENTS

Reviews

  • Volkswagen ID. Buzz Pro review Volkswagen ID. Buzz Pro review
  • Volvo EX30 Performance review Volvo EX30 Performance review
  • Which Skoda is better - Enyaq iV or Enyaq Coupe RS iV Which Skoda is better - Enyaq iV or Enyaq Coupe RS iV
  • Nissan Ariya review Nissan Ariya review

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2025 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com