ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

BMW iX xDrive50 beats its EPA range by 100km in real life test

  • Post your comment

Max McDee, 21 July 2022

BMW Range test

Edmunds performed its real life test on a BMW iX xDrive50 after they did the same to the BMW i4. The i4 impressed with its range and beat its EPA estimate and now the iX is following in its footsteps.

BMW iX, unlike the i4, is a purpose built electric car and the efficiency of the drivetrain was part of its design - not an afterthought. What the two have in common are the brushed current-excited AC synchronous motors. The main selling point for those is that they don’t use any rare earth metals - there are no permanent magnets inside. This clever solution means no political issues and no supply chain delays.

BMW iX xDrive50 beats its EPA range by 100 km

The magnetic field inside those motors is created by DC current from the batteries, the idea is not new and in fact Tesla uses it in its asynchronous induction motors. The difference is that the BMW’s motors are much smaller and offer much greater power density, they offer better efficiency and more precise operation at lower speed. That’s simply an advantage of time, BMW took a lot of it to develop its product.

Onto the test. BMW iX xDrive50 comes with 516 horsepower, 564 lb-ft of torque and a 106.3 kWh battery. The test car came with optional 22” wheels and its EPA stands at 315 miles. Every car tested by Edmunds follows the same route until it runs out of battery. The area where the test is performed has very constant weather providing ideal conditions for real life range testing.

BMW iX xDrive50 beats its EPA range by 100 km

The car had most of the extra options included and it was weighed before the test - the result was 5,707 pounds - that’s 2.58 metric tons. The 22” wheels were wrapped in 275/40 tires and with all that the EPA consumption estimate was 39 kWh/100 miles. How did the car do?

After all day of driving the car eventually ran out of charge at 377 miles - that’s nearly 607 km. The consumption rate ended up being a staggering 32 kWh/100 miles which is 3 kWh/100 miles better than the Tesla Model X managed. It bested its EPA estimate by nearly 20% and it even beat the BMW i4 in the process.

BMW iX xDrive50 beats its EPA range by 100 km

Edmunds looks at the real life costs of driving the EV as well and in this test they have calculated that it would have cost the owner $50.67 to cover the 377 miles if they were in Hawaii. Moving to Idaho, where the electricity is the cheapest, would mean paying $12.06 to cover the same distance. $12 to cover 377 miles in utmost comfort and silence.

Gasoline equivalent BMW X5 M50i would have covered the same distance for $126.92 in Hawaii and $117.29 in Idaho. Regardless of whether we want the iX xDrive50, we all should move to Idaho - clearly. Driving the electric SUV in Idaho over 10,000 miles a year will save you $2,727 every year, if you live in Idaho of course. Living in Hawaii comes at a price and the savings come down to $1,754. And the purchase price difference? The iX is $400 more expensive.

BMW iX xDrive50 beats its EPA range by 100 km

You can have a closer look at Edmunds leaderboard using the link below, you’ll find the BMW iX ended up taking 4th spot overall. We have a full review of the BMW iX M60 if you want to know more about the car.

Source

Related articles
  • BMW has already made two million EVs BMW has already made two million EVs
  • BMW says new electric M3 will match ICE version's price BMW says new electric M3 will match ICE version's price
  • BMW iX3 gets more range ahead of its US launch BMW iX3 gets more range ahead of its US launch
  • 2027 BMW 7-Series gets a high-tech makeover 2027 BMW 7-Series gets a high-tech makeover
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 0

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Dacia
  • Ford
  • Jeep
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Zeekr
  • Jaguar
  • Mini
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • MG
  • Voyah
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • RAM
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • All brands

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelAudi
    Q4 e-tron performance
  • ModelAudi
    Q4 Sportback e-tron
  • ModelBMW
    i7 LCI M70 xDrive
  • ModelHyundai
    Ioniq 3 Standard Range
  • ModelMercedes
    C400 4MATIC
  • ModelVolkswagen
    ID.3 Neo 79 kWh

Featured

  • Huge real life test shows EV range loss at -15°C Huge real life test shows EV range loss at -15°C
  • Comparison of NEDC, EPA and WLTP cycles Comparison of NEDC, EPA and WLTP cycles
  • Volvo EX90 alternatives - Mercedes EQS SUV 580 and Tesla Model X LR+ Volvo EX90 alternatives - Mercedes EQS SUV 580 and Tesla Model X LR+
  • Polestar 3 edges Tesla Model 3 out in 24 vehicle winter range test Polestar 3 edges Tesla Model 3 out in 24 vehicle winter range test
  • Why do modern vehicles beep so much while driving? Why do modern vehicles beep so much while driving?

Reviews

  • AAWireless Two wireless Android Auto adapter review AAWireless Two wireless Android Auto adapter review
  • 2026 BMW iX3 Neue Klasse detailed tour and impressions 2026 BMW iX3 Neue Klasse detailed tour and impressions
  • The XPENG P7 is a low-slung speed machine that thinks like a human The XPENG P7 is a low-slung speed machine that thinks like a human
  • Mercedes-Benz GLC 400 4Matic: interior, design and features review Mercedes-Benz GLC 400 4Matic: interior, design and features review
ADVERTISEMENTS

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2026 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com