ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

Tesla knowingly installed defective parts, made customers pay for repairs

  • Post your comment
  • Comments (4)

Max McDee, 22 December 2023

Tesla

A recent Reuters investigation exposed how Tesla knowingly installed faulty components in its electric vehicles and then charged customers for repairs, brushing off responsibility by blaming drivers for "abuse" and prior damage.

This Model 3 lost its front wheel at 60 mph This Model 3 lost its front wheel at 60 mph

Tesla's questionable build quality, a recurring topic over the years, takes a darker turn as the investigation uncovers the automaker actively concealing defects. Despite being aware of faulty components, Tesla shifted the blame to customers, denying responsibility for parts failures, even in cases where the cars had fewer than 1,000 miles on the odometer.

The report opens with a distressing incident involving a UK customer's brand-new 2023 Tesla Model Y. A mere day after delivery, the EV experienced a catastrophic failure, losing steering control during a low-speed turn with the family on board. Astonishingly, the front-right suspension collapsed after a meager 115 miles. Rather than covering the $14,000 repair under warranty, Tesla attributed the issue to "prior" damage.

That's not what it supposed to look like That's not what it supposed to look like

A Model 3 owner in the United States faced a similarly nightmarish scenario. With under 15,000 miles in a year of ownership, the EV's front wheel detached while driving on Autopilot at 60 mph. Although Tesla replaced upper control arms on approximately 120,000 cars globally between January 2021 and March 2022, around 31,000 owners of older cars had to foot the bill for suspension failures.

In Norway former Tesla service managers and technicians claim they were instructed to pass on the cost of frequent failures to customers, effectively cutting into warranty and goodwill repair costs since 2017. This unethical practice prompted resignations, with one service manager stating, "Now, we have to quit talking bullshit."


Tesla's issues extended beyond control arms to half shafts and steering columns, with customers sometimes paying over $4,000 for repairs despite the vehicles still being under warranty. Design problems persisted, leading Tesla to redesign the Model S front aft link multiple times. However, the revised part seemingly made its way only to EVs bound for China, where a recall was eventually forced after years of delay.

In the pursuit of trimming costs, Tesla resorted to accusing customers of "driver abuse" to offset the staggering $263 million loss in the repair business during the fourth quarter of 2018. This loss, nearly double the quarterly profit, pushed Tesla to pay almost $500 for repairs on every Tesla model in operation at the time.

Source

This article contains localized units and prices. Change settings.
Your choice
Related articles
  • Pricier and heavier Tesla Model S and Model X refresh leaves fans unimpressed Pricier and heavier Tesla Model S and Model X refresh leaves fans unimpressed
  • Tesla's Robotaxi service set for Austin debut on June 22 Tesla's Robotaxi service set for Austin debut on June 22
  • Tesla begins autonomous driving tests in Austin ahead of launch Tesla begins autonomous driving tests in Austin ahead of launch
  • Tesla's robotic ambitions face human-sized problem with key departure Tesla's robotic ambitions face human-sized problem with key departure

Reader comments

C
  • CptPower
  • SH3
  • 27 Dec 2023

Same thing happened in 70s era when comercial flights becomes more popular. The only difference is when car crashes usually 1-2 people dies. When plane crashes 200-600 people dies.

  • Reply
y
  • yalim
  • mu4
  • 27 Dec 2023

wasn't it tesla model s last week with a brake failure during drag test review? tesla goes from 0-100 in 2secs but, they are even unable stop the car. which feature is more crucial 0-100 or 100-0?

  • Reply
?
  • Anonymous
  • SH{
  • 23 Dec 2023

Obviously, the same practice continues. I took over the new 3 Highland model, which is defective. No one is working on my problem and they don't offer me any solution, because they don't even know what the problem really is. The car h...

  • Reply
  • Read all comments
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 4

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Genesis
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Ford
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Jaguar
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • Mini
  • MG
  • Vinfast
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • [..]

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelCadillac
    Optiq-V
  • ModelCadillac
    Optiq
  • ModelNissan
    Leaf
  • ModelSmart
    #5 Brabus
  • ModelJeep
    Compass
  • ModelSubaru
    Solterra

Featured

  • Have electric cars gone power crazy? Have electric cars gone power crazy?
  • Why solar panels on cars make no sense (at this point) Why solar panels on cars make no sense (at this point)
  • EREV or Extended Range Electric Vehicle explained EREV or Extended Range Electric Vehicle explained
  • Mirror cameras: The pros and cons Mirror cameras: The pros and cons
  • Polestar 3 edges Tesla Model 3 out in 24 vehicle winter range test Polestar 3 edges Tesla Model 3 out in 24 vehicle winter range test
ADVERTISEMENTS

Reviews

  • Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD review Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD review
  • Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 review Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 review
  • 57 electric cars range tested at highway speeds - who wins? PART 2 57 electric cars range tested at highway speeds - who wins? PART 2
  • Which Skoda is better - Enyaq iV or Enyaq Coupe RS iV Which Skoda is better - Enyaq iV or Enyaq Coupe RS iV

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2025 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com