ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

Automatic Emergency Braking tested by AAA with surprising results

  • Post your comment
  • Comments (3)

Max McDee, 30 September 2022

Other Misc

AAA took on the testing of AEB systems because it believed the tests carried out by the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) - the equivalent of the European NCAP - were not adequate and not representative of real-life situations.

According to IIHS, cars equipped with AEB systems were involved in 50 percent less of rear-end collisions. That’s a big statement on its own and that’s why all the new cars are equipped with these life saving systems. Not all is what it seems though, IIHS own research showed that the systems perform poorly in bad lighting conditions and now the AAA found that they don’t really work as they should when tested in real-life situations and at real-life speeds.

Automatic Emergency Braking tested by AAA with surprising results

The IIHS tests those systems at 25 mph and according to the AAA that’s the issue here. The AAA conducted its own research and found out that at least 60 percent of rear-end collisions happen between 30 and 45 mph. The conclusion was simple - 25 mph testing only covers 40 percent of situations therefore cannot be representative enough.

The AAA went even further and tested two more types of collisions that are responsible for nearly 80 percent of injuries - the so-called T-bone collisions, and collisions when turning across traffic with an oncoming vehicle. Cars used in tests were 2022 Chevy Equinox, 2022 Ford Explorer, 2022 Honda CR-V and 2022 Toyota RAV4.

Keeping the speed down below 30 mph resulted in almost all cars performing as they should have, all cars had 5 attempts and only Equinox failed to stop once, with the CR-V ending up crashing into stationary traffic twice. Both cars managed to slow down significantly though, resulting in a collision with a small impact.

Automatic Emergency Braking tested by AAA with surprising results

With the speeds raised to 40 mph the results were less than stellar - the only take out is that all cars warned the driver and applied the brakes. Ford, despite crashing every time, managed to do it at the slowest speeds. CR-V managed to avoid the accident twice but when it crashed, it did it at nearly 10 mph. The RAV4 avoided the accident four times but when it did crash, it did it at nearly full speed, managing to shave off only 8 mph.Chevy Equinox managed to scrub off over 17 mph of its terminal speed but still crashed every time.

When it came to T-bone and cross traffic collisions - every car failed miserably. What is even worse, every car failed to alert the driver or apply the brakes, in essence the systems failed and the cars collided at full speed.

The IIHS already announced it will increase the speed in its AEB testing to better reflect the road scenarios. The failure of the systems to recognise T-bone and cross traffic collisions is a wake-up call for car manufacturers.

Source

Related articles
  • Poland bans Chinese-made vehicles from entering certain military facilities Poland bans Chinese-made vehicles from entering certain military facilities
  • Nebula Next 01 concept is here to preview the next EV supercar Nebula Next 01 concept is here to preview the next EV supercar
  • FAW Hongqi shows off its first solid-state battery EV FAW Hongqi shows off its first solid-state battery EV
  • Dimentro DP-Pro review: World-first e-bike with a semi-solid-state battery Dimentro DP-Pro review: World-first e-bike with a semi-solid-state battery

Reader comments

F
  • False Positive
  • Yav
  • 10 Aug 2024

AEB is dangerous. Tried on three different mainstream systems. All were terrifying and each nearly deadly. Entering unprotected turns into traffic, objects in the breakdown lane, cross-traffic, reversing, all fail to operate in a safe, predictable...

  • Reply
M
  • MaxMcDee
  • iBu
  • 02 Oct 2022

Mark - well spotted, thank you ;)

  • Reply
M
  • Mark
  • g@E
  • 01 Oct 2022

Hahaha "Ford Equinox" is not a real vehicle 😂

  • Reply
  • Read all comments
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 3

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Dacia
  • Ford
  • Jeep
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Zeekr
  • Jaguar
  • Mini
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • MG
  • Voyah
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • RAM
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • All brands

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelTesla
    Model Y L Premium
  • ModelMercedes
    VLE 300 Electric
  • ModelTesla
    Model Y AWD
  • ModelXPeng
    P7+ 74.9 kWh
  • ModelVolvo
    EX60 P12
  • ModelVolvo
    EX60 Cross Country P12

Featured

  • Comparison of NEDC, EPA and WLTP cycles Comparison of NEDC, EPA and WLTP cycles
  • Huge real life test shows EV range loss at -15°C Huge real life test shows EV range loss at -15°C
  • Audi Q8 55 e-tron alternatives - BMW iX xDrive50 and Polestar 3 LR Audi Q8 55 e-tron alternatives - BMW iX xDrive50 and Polestar 3 LR
  • Why BMW i3 was ahead of its time Why BMW i3 was ahead of its time
  • Xpeng P7 AWD quick review and drive Xpeng P7 AWD quick review and drive
ADVERTISEMENTS

Reviews

  • Mini Cooper SE JCW review Mini Cooper SE JCW review
  • Maserati Grecale Folgore review Maserati Grecale Folgore review
  • 2026 XPeng X9 PowerX interior, design and features review 2026 XPeng X9 PowerX interior, design and features review
  • BMW i5 M60 xDrive Touring review BMW i5 M60 xDrive Touring review

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2026 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com