ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

Lucid Air tops new massive range test, VW ID.7 disappoints

  • Post your comment
  • Comments (11)

Vik Braykov, 30 January 2024

Lucid Tesla BMW Hyundai BYD Range test

Another major EV range arrived, this time courtesy of the guy from Motor 1. It involved 11 of the most popular EV models and showed how long they can go on a charge. The cars were driven at the same time alongside the "Autostrada del Grande Raccordo Anulare”"- the ring road surrounding the city of Rome, Italy, ensuring equal conditions for each vehicle.

Choosing this circuit is no accident - it is longer than the famous Nurburgring and simulates the conditions a normal driver stumbles upon on a daily drive. It has its traffic jams, accelerations, stops and every other aspect of a daily commute. The fact that all vehicles are moving together eliminates the risk of error and some drivers having a lighter commute than others.

The models tested are as follows: BMW i5, BYD Seal, Fiat 600e, Hyundai Ioniq 6, Jeep Avenger, Kia EV9, Lexus RZ, Lucid Air, Tesla Model 3, Toyota bZ4X and VW ID.7. All cars are charged at 100% and are driven until they have 5% left, so the Range achieved is expected to be shorter than promised, but actually should be closer to real life as nobody drives their EV until fully empty. The objective was to find how close the cars come to their official WLTP ratings.

Ambient temperatures aren’t mentioned in the video, but on one of the vehicles we notice a readout of 55°F, so we would say pretty close to optimal weather.

The Lucid Air GT was the runaway winner, in no small part thanks to its huge 112 kWh battery pack. But when it comes to being closest to the WLTP rating, the BMW i5 was the most impressive performer. While the VW ID.7 came 36% short from its stated range, the BMW i5 eDrive40 only experienced a 16% deviation.

In terms of consumption, the Tesla Model 3 shows just how efficient it can be with its 4.1 mi/kWh. The Hyundai Ioniq 6 comes to a close second place by consuming just 4 mi/kWh, while the rest of the contenders need a little bit more energy. The two worst-performing vehicles in the test by far are the Toyota bZ4X and the Lexus RZ, both Japanese models needing north of 2.5 mi/kWh and coming 40% of their WLTP ratings.

We've summed up the results in the table below so you can draw your own comparisons. Hit the comments section to let us know which cars were the biggest disappointments and which exceeded your expectations?

Model Range WLTP rating Consumption Battery size
Lucid Air 355 miles 521 miles 3.2 mi/kWh 112 kWh
Tesla Model 3 309 miles 391 miles 4.1 mi/kWh 75 kWh
BMW i5 304 miles 362 miles 3.7 mi/kWh 81.2 kWh
Hyundai Ioniq 6 296 miles 382 miles 3.4 mi/kWh 74 kWh
BYD Seal 281 miles 354 miles 3.4 mi/kWh 82.5 kWh
Kia EV9 278 miles 350 miles 3.4 mi/kWh 96 kWh
Volkswagen ID.7 249 miles 386 miles 3.2 mi/kWh 77 kWh
Fiat 600e 175 miles 254 miles 3.2 mi/kWh 51 kWh
Jeep Avenger 171 miles 249 miles 2.9 mi/kWh 51 kWh
Toyota bZ4X 155 miles 260 miles 2.4 mi/kWh 64 kWh
Lexus RZ 151 miles 252 miles 2.4 mi/kWh 64 kWh

Source

This article contains localized units and prices. Change settings.
Your choice
Related articles
  • Jeep Avenger real world range test Jeep Avenger real world range test
  • BMW i7 xDrive60 real world range test BMW i7 xDrive60 real world range test
  • Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ real world range test Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ real world range test
  • Hyundai Kona 2024 vs Hyundai Kona 2019 range test Hyundai Kona 2024 vs Hyundai Kona 2019 range test

Reader comments

  • Fearghast
  • ps1
  • 01 Feb 2024

Well ... Toyota bZ4X is probably the lightest EV SUV, but the efficiency is certainly not ideal.

  • Reply
m
  • mikcole
  • sfP
  • 01 Feb 2024

Weight. Big batts = more weight = less efficiency

  • Reply
?
  • Anonymous
  • d%H
  • 01 Feb 2024

Incorrect WTLP for Tesla model 3, it got 18” wheels on which means the WTLP is 678km. (Which would then be a 27% range difference) They should have given more information regarding wheel size as it affects range.

  • Reply
  • Read all comments
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 11

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Genesis
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Ford
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Jaguar
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • Mini
  • MG
  • Vinfast
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • [..]

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelXiaomi
    YU7 Max
  • ModelNissan
    Leaf 75kWh
  • ModelTesla
    Model S Plaid
  • ModelNissan
    Micra EV 52kWh
  • ModelTesla
    Model X Plaid
  • ModelGenesis
    GV60 Performance AWD

Featured

  • Analyzing the Mercedes-Benz EQXX revolutionary concept Analyzing the Mercedes-Benz EQXX revolutionary concept
  • Volvo EX90 alternatives - Mercedes EQS SUV 580 and Tesla Model X LR+ Volvo EX90 alternatives - Mercedes EQS SUV 580 and Tesla Model X LR+
  • Why BMW i3 was ahead of its time Why BMW i3 was ahead of its time
  • Xpeng P7 AWD quick review and drive Xpeng P7 AWD quick review and drive
  • Different types of electric motors used in EVs Different types of electric motors used in EVs
ADVERTISEMENTS

Reviews

  • Mercedes EQS SUV 580 review Mercedes EQS SUV 580 review
  • Nissan Ariya review Nissan Ariya review
  • Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 review Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 review
  • Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic review Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic review

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2025 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com