ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

Tesla is facing new lawsuit over Autopilot and FSD

  • Post your comment
  • Comments (3)

Max McDee, 15 September 2022

Tesla

A Tesla Model X owner filed a proposed class action lawsuit in San Francisco federal court against Tesla and Elon Musk. He accuses the company of deceptive and misleading marketing tactics and straight fraudulent actions over the Autopilot and the FSD system.

In the filing, the plaintiff claims he paid the $5,000 fee for Enhanced Autopilot package in 2018 while it was sold as the precursor to Full Self-Driving. The lawsuit accuses Tesla of constantly touting the technology as being “just around a corner” since 2016 while knowing the technology didn’t work or in some cases did not exist. The plaintiff accuses Tesla of knowingly making the vehicles unsafe.

The suit goes on to claim that Tesla did it just to generate excitement about the company and its vehicles in order to attract investment. It points to Tesla apparently misleading the public about the capabilities of the Autopilot to drum up sales of cars to avoid bankruptcy at an earlier stage.

Many Tesla accidents are blamed on Autopilot but often the driver was in charge Many Tesla accidents are blamed on Autopilot but often the driver was in charge

In the 84 page filing, Mr Matsko argues that Tesla is yet to produce “anything even remotely approaching a fully self-driving car.” He continues to say that FSD, now a $15,000 option, is still not ready and should’n be allowed to be sold to customers.

He follows with pointing out Elon Musk’s claims of autonomous cross-country trips being possible by 2018 and never materializing, as well as the 2019 claim about 1 million autonomous robotaxis on the roads by 2020. Elon Musk eventually gave up on the cross-country trip idea an admitted it will need a specialized route. As for robotaxis - they are apparently coming some time in 2025.

The plaintiff backs up his claim of Tesla’s fraudulent actions by using the company's 2016 Full Self-Driving video promoting the feature. We all know that clip, we all watched with amazement Model X driving through a city, dropping off its driver and then parking itself. We all wanted that car there and then.

There are actual items for sale on the Internet to bypass Tesla Autopilot safety precautions  There are actual items for sale on the Internet to bypass Tesla Autopilot safety precautions

The truth was quite murky as it turned out a bit later. According to engineers involved in the shooting of this clip, the car used a specially pre-charted and high-definition 3D mapped route. None of that technology is available on any of Tesla’s cars to this day.

The lawsuit goes on to claim the FSD and Autopilot are not just a fraud but are actually dangerous and quotes the 2018 Model X accident in which the driver died after the car crashed into a concrete barrier. Another accident quoted in the lawsuit is that of Tesla crashing into a stationary fire truck. That accident resulted in a federal investigation which was expanded over following years into 11 similar accidents.

The plaintiff is looking for a class action with punitive and restorative compensation not specified in the suit. He wants Tesla to be forced to stop the misleading marketing tactics and stop using paying customers as untrained test engineers.

This is how Tesla sees the road ahead This is how Tesla sees the road ahead

Tesla hasn't been sleeping and this lawsuit is not a surprise, the company has been preparing for a while putting one of the industry’s strongest legal teams together. Whether anything comes out of this lawsuit or not, the fact is that many people still take the Autopilot or FSD for an actual autonomous system while Tesla explicitly says it isn’t. Despite its confusing (maybe misleading) name, the FSD requires driver’s full and constant attention - and it always did.

NHTSA has opened 38 crash investigations involving Tesla and ADAS with nineteen deaths recorded in those crashes since 2016. There are serious questions that will be asked and the answers won’t be pretty. This is the “caution - hot drink” on coffee paper cups moment for Tesla and it will have to do more than just put warnings in small print.

The allegations of Tesla knowing about the Autopilot not actually working, faking its abilities and endangering people’s lives are quite serious if only can be proven. Did Elon Musk get ahead of himself? Absolutely yes, many times over. But rather than believing his every word, we should exercise a bit more common sense and a lot more caution.

Source

Related articles
  • Elon Musk considers a merger between Tesla, SpaceX and xAI, credible reports say Elon Musk considers a merger between Tesla, SpaceX and xAI, credible reports say
  • Tesla discontinues the Model S and Model X, shifting its focus to humanoid robots Tesla discontinues the Model S and Model X, shifting its focus to humanoid robots
  • Tesla profits drop as automaker starts to move away from electric cars Tesla profits drop as automaker starts to move away from electric cars
  • Tesla launches Cybertruck in the Middle East as American sales crater Tesla launches Cybertruck in the Middle East as American sales crater

Reader comments

C
  • CptPower
  • Lfw
  • 23 Sep 2022

Well.......... Hey its tesla so its nothing new. Just like Apple or Google bad practicies everywhere.

  • Reply
  • Fearghast
  • 6sP
  • 16 Sep 2022

Autopilot is nice and all, but you can bet it would not be able to drive on most the roads and even some highways in my country ... safely or without damaging the car in the process. FSD is doing a lot of progress and I am watching it closely, but ...

  • Reply
?
  • Anonymous
  • 0Tk
  • 16 Sep 2022

Autopilot is far ahead of anything currently available, and it's perfectly usable in the situations it is intended for. Part of the delays are regulatory, and the well-publicized accidents are few and far between, often at least partially due to...

  • Reply
  • Read all comments
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 3

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Dacia
  • Ford
  • Jeep
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Zeekr
  • Jaguar
  • Mini
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • MG
  • Voyah
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • RAM
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • All brands

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelVolvo
    EX60 P12
  • ModelVolvo
    EX60 Cross Country P12
  • ModelOmoda
    5 EV FWD
  • ModelZeekr
    7GT Privilege AWD
  • ModelMercedes
    GLB 350 4Matic
  • ModelPorsche
    Cayenne Turbo Electric

Featured

  • Have electric cars gone power crazy? Have electric cars gone power crazy?
  • Grand test: Which is the fastest EV? Grand test: Which is the fastest EV?
  • EREV or Extended Range Electric Vehicle explained EREV or Extended Range Electric Vehicle explained
  • VW ID.4, Audi Q4 and Skoda Enyaq - three identical yet so different EVs VW ID.4, Audi Q4 and Skoda Enyaq - three identical yet so different EVs
  • Why electric cars don't have conventional gearboxes Why electric cars don't have conventional gearboxes
ADVERTISEMENTS

Reviews

  • Hyundai Ioniq 5 N review Hyundai Ioniq 5 N review
  • Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 review Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 review
  • NIO ET7 quick review and drive NIO ET7 quick review and drive
  • 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh review 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh review

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2026 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com