ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

Tesla pays nearly $10,000 settlement over misleading FSD claims

  • Post your comment

Max McDee, 08 November 2023

Tesla

Tesla's ambitious promises of a Full Self-Driving (FSD) system have recently faced scrutiny from the UK legal system. Edward Butler, a Tesla Model 3 owner, has successfully challenged the electric car giant, securing a settlement of approximately $10,000. The victory circles around Tesla's claims of FSD capabilities that, according to Butler, have failed to materialize, thereby breaching the Consumer Rights Act of 2015.

In 2016, Tesla introduced the FSD system as a futuristic addition to its electric vehicles, making both promises of cars capable of navigating the hustle of traffic lights and the ballet of city driving without human intervention. The system, priced initially at $3,000, has seen its cost fluctuate over the years, yet the promised autonomy of the technology has remained, at best, a work in progress.

Despite Tesla opening the beta version of FSD to US customers last year - preceded by a safety score eligibility period - its vehicles have not come anywhere close to the fully autonomous driving nirvana. The technology lingers at Level 2 autonomy, according to the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), requiring drivers to remain vigilant and engaged. This has understandably brought regulatory probes and legal challenges, as the moniker 'Full Self-Driving' is clearly a misnomer.

Tesla pays nearly $10,000 settlement over misleading FSD claims

For Butler, the issue hit closer to home. His 2019 purchase of a Tesla Model 3, complete with the FSD option for $8,000 (UK price at the time of purchase), was predicated on Tesla's website claims that traffic light recognition and autonomous city driving were on the imminent horizon. When Tesla failed to deliver these features within their projected timeline, Butler took action, citing that the website's promises were a contractual element of his purchase.

Tesla's response to Butler's initial legal saber-rattling was a settlement offer devoid of interest and laden with confidentiality clauses. Butler held his ground, and Tesla, perhaps recognizing the solidity of his case, agreed to a more favorable settlement - complete with interest and sans the silence agreement.

The settlement, totaling £8,015.22 (nearly $10,000) also included court fees. And while it is not setting a legal precedent, it underscores the potency of consumer protection laws against misleading corporate advertising. Interestingly, Tesla has had its day in court before on related issues, once being mandated to upgrade a driver's FSD computer at no extra cost.


Tesla pays nearly $10,000 settlement over misleading FSD claims

The Butler case illuminates the often cumbersome and solitary journey through small claims court, a process that, while more accessible than a full-blown lawsuit, still necessitates a savvy understanding of the legal system - a quality Tesla wished to suppress by proposing a "non-advice" clause in its settlements. This tactic is part of a broader strategy of companies like Tesla to individually settle disputes without opening the floodgates to widespread restitution claims, which, for Tesla, could involve at least 285,000 FSD customers.

Class action lawsuits, by contrast, serve as a collective hammer of justice, pooling similar grievances against corporations. Yet, the binding arbitration clauses - frequently upheld by courts - strip consumers and employees of their right to a day in court, pushing them instead towards private, often less favorable, arbitral tribunals.

The case's ripples extend beyond the legal realm, potentially affecting public perception of Tesla. While the company continues to profit from the promise of future software capabilities, the ethical question looms: would customer goodwill not be better served by offering refunds for a system that remains, for some, perennially out of reach?

For UK Tesla owners feeling shortchanged by the elusive FSD functionality, Butler's victory offers a blueprint for recourse. The Tesla Motors Club forum thread, complete with documentation of Butler's legal journey, serves as a starting point for similarly affected consumers.

Source

This article contains localized units and prices. Change settings.
Your choice
Related articles
  • Tesla's growth hits a snag as deliveries tumble 13% in second quarter Tesla's growth hits a snag as deliveries tumble 13% in second quarter
  • Tesla's new factory promises cheaper batteries for more affordable EVs Tesla's new factory promises cheaper batteries for more affordable EVs
  • Tesla slams brakes on rumor of hiring ex-Cruise executive Tesla slams brakes on rumor of hiring ex-Cruise executive
  • Tesla shakes up leadership as sales are tumbling Tesla shakes up leadership as sales are tumbling
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 0

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Genesis
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Ford
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Jaguar
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • Mini
  • MG
  • Vinfast
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • [..]

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelXiaomi
    YU7 Max
  • ModelNissan
    Leaf 75kWh
  • ModelTesla
    Model S Plaid
  • ModelNissan
    Micra EV 52kWh
  • ModelTesla
    Model X Plaid
  • ModelGenesis
    GV60 Performance AWD

Featured

  • Why BMW i3 was ahead of its time Why BMW i3 was ahead of its time
  • Here's a breakdown of the cost of an EV battery Here's a breakdown of the cost of an EV battery
  • Can hydrogen fuel cells replace EV batteries? Can hydrogen fuel cells replace EV batteries?
  • VW ID.4, Audi Q4 and Skoda Enyaq - three identical yet so different EVs VW ID.4, Audi Q4 and Skoda Enyaq - three identical yet so different EVs
  • No, your 800V Hyundai or Kia doesn't charge at 350kW No, your 800V Hyundai or Kia doesn't charge at 350kW
ADVERTISEMENTS

Reviews

  • Volkswagen ID. Buzz Pro review Volkswagen ID. Buzz Pro review
  • Which Skoda is better - Enyaq iV or Enyaq Coupe RS iV Which Skoda is better - Enyaq iV or Enyaq Coupe RS iV
  • Ora 03 (Funky Cat) review Ora 03 (Funky Cat) review
  • Mini Countryman SE ALL4 review Mini Countryman SE ALL4 review

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2025 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com