ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

Texas lawmakers suggest delay for Tesla Robotaxi launch in Austin

  • Post your comment

Max McDee, 19 June 2025

Tesla

Tesla's much-anticipated Robotaxi launch in Austin, originally set for June 22, faces a potential delay following a request from a group of Texas lawmakers. Seven members of the Austin delegation in the Texas Senate and House of Representatives sent a letter to the EV giant, asking the company to postpone its driverless operations until a new state law takes effect on September 1, 2025.

The new Texas law generally keeps a permissive stance on autonomous driving, but it introduces important changes. It includes requirements for following federal guidelines and references the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) autonomous driving levels. Lawmakers believe delaying the launch gives Tesla a chance to ensure full compliance with this updated framework, which is seen as crucial for public confidence in the growing field of self-driving cars.

Texas lawmakers suggest delay for Tesla Robotaxi launch in Austin

The news comes as Tesla attempts to launch its autonomous taxi service after years of ambitious promises and missed deadlines. Musk himself has previously said that the planned Robotaxi service is "not really self-driving," suggesting a tad more limited scope for the initial rollout.

The request from lawmakers could offer Tesla a convenient way to adjust its launch timeline. The company is notorious for pushing back targets for its autonomous driving initiatives. Sources indicate that testing of Tesla's Robotaxi without a safety driver has been limited. Some observations even suggest that the "safety driver" might simply be relocated to the passenger seat in the hope of improving public perception rather than truly demonstrating full autonomy.

Adding pressure to Tesla's Robotaxi launch, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) gave the company a deadline to provide detailed answers regarding its plans. This federal scrutiny shows there's a need for Tesla to demonstrate the safety and reliability of its autonomous systems. The proposed delay until September would give Tesla additional months to comply with both state and federal requirements, potentially mitigating regulatory pressures.

BREAKING:

THE FIRST EVER TESLA ROBOTAXI WITH NO ONE IN THE DRIVER SEAT WAS JUST SPOTTED IN AUSTIN

Robotaxi is printed on the side of the car 😎$TSLApic.twitter.com/TK39Tojhzq

— Dalton Brewer (@daltybrewer) June 10, 2025

Austin's streets could soon see a fleet of driverless Tesla Model Y vehicles, but the exact details, such as pricing, operating areas, and how many vehicles will be part of the initial fleet, remain largely undisclosed by Tesla. The company's focus on autonomous driving, especially the Robotaxi project, has never been more important for its long-term strategy. Many analysts note that the success of these initiatives heavily influences the company's valuation since the sales of Tesla vehicles have nosedived over the last few months.

The request from Texas lawmakers shows how the regulatory landscape for advanced driver-assistance systems is changing. The June 22 deadline for the Robotaxi service to go live is quickly approaching, and the coming days will reveal whether Tesla opts to launch it as promised or if it will take the unexpected lifeline and delay it for a couple of months.

Via

Related articles
  • Tesla Model Y hints at spacious six-seater layout Tesla Model Y hints at spacious six-seater layout
  • Pricier and heavier Tesla Model S and Model X refresh leaves fans unimpressed Pricier and heavier Tesla Model S and Model X refresh leaves fans unimpressed
  • Tesla's Robotaxi service set for Austin debut on June 22 Tesla's Robotaxi service set for Austin debut on June 22
  • Tesla begins autonomous driving tests in Austin ahead of launch Tesla begins autonomous driving tests in Austin ahead of launch
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 0

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Genesis
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Ford
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Jaguar
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • Mini
  • MG
  • Vinfast
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • [..]

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelTesla
    Model S Plaid
  • ModelTesla
    Model X Plaid
  • ModelNissan
    Leaf 75kWh
  • ModelCadillac
    Optiq-V
  • ModelCadillac
    Optiq
  • ModelJeep
    Compass

Featured

  • Why BMW i3 was ahead of its time Why BMW i3 was ahead of its time
  • Why electric cars don't have conventional gearboxes Why electric cars don't have conventional gearboxes
  • Why solar panels on cars make no sense (at this point) Why solar panels on cars make no sense (at this point)
  • Volvo EX90 alternatives - Mercedes EQS SUV 580 and Tesla Model X LR+ Volvo EX90 alternatives - Mercedes EQS SUV 580 and Tesla Model X LR+
  • Different types of electric motors used in EVs Different types of electric motors used in EVs
ADVERTISEMENTS

Reviews

  • Xpeng P7 AWD quick review and drive Xpeng P7 AWD quick review and drive
  • Polestar 2 Long Range AWD review Polestar 2 Long Range AWD review
  • Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ review Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ review
  • Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD review Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD review

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2025 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com