ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

Tesla will sue re-sellers of first delivered Cybertruck

  • Post your comment
  • Comments (2)

Max McDee, 13 November 2023

Tesla

The Cybertruck, a vehicle that has become almost mythical in the automotive world, is finally about to hit the roads. And to make sure early buyers are in for the truck itself rather than just looking to make a quick buck Tesla has introduced new resale restriction.

Tesla's update to its Motor Vehicle Purchase Agreement introduces a novel clause specifically for Cybertruck buyers: a prohibition on reselling the vehicle within the first year after delivery. This move is not entirely unprecedented in the automotive world, particularly in the realm of rare or highly sought-after vehicles. Similar restrictions have been seen with brands like Ferrari and Ford, especially concerning limited-edition models.

Tesla holds Cybertruck in tight grip - will sue early re-sellers

What sets Tesla's policy apart is the broader appeal and production scale of the Cybertruck compared to the niche, high-cost models typically associated with such restrictions. Tesla's stance is clear: no flipping of Cybertrucks for quick profits. Violation of this clause comes with a hefty penalty - a lawsuit for $50,000 or more, and potential exclusion from future Tesla purchases.

The rationale behind such a stringent policy is partly in Tesla's past experiences. The company has seen its vehicles, particularly early models, resell for significant premiums. Moreover, there's the concern about early models - often with more teething issues - landing in the hands of those more interested in profit than in the brand's ethos.

From a buyer's perspective, the clause is a mixed bag. On the one hand, it curtails the chaos of early model reselling and ensures a more controlled release. On the other, it imposes a notable limitation on ownership rights, which might not sit well with all customers. Tesla's policy, while aimed at maintaining the brand's integrity and market value, might be perceived as overly controlling or even elitist.

Tesla holds Cybertruck in tight grip - will sue early re-sellers

The Cybertruck's many delays, huge number of pre-orders and likely low production make it a prime candidate for high resale value, attracting potential scalpers. However, Tesla's method of curbing this practice might come across as heavy-handed to some consumers.

With the launch quickly approaching, the impact of this resale restriction will be watched closely by consumers and industry analysts alike. As Tesla navigates these uncharted waters, its policies' reception and effectiveness will be critical factors in shaping the company's future strategies and its relationship with its customer base.

Via

This article contains localized units and prices. Change settings.
Your choice
Related articles
  • SpaceX to the rescue: why Elon Musk is buying his own Tesla Cybertrucks SpaceX to the rescue: why Elon Musk is buying his own Tesla Cybertrucks
  • Tesla owners in Europe start legal fight over Full Self-Driving promises Tesla owners in Europe start legal fight over Full Self-Driving promises
  • Tesla’s Spring Update 2026 brings big changes Tesla’s Spring Update 2026 brings big changes
  • Tesla says goodbye to its original icons with the exclusive Signature Edition Tesla says goodbye to its original icons with the exclusive Signature Edition

Reader comments

?
  • Anonymous
  • 04N
  • 14 Nov 2023

tesla is made in china sold like american product hahahaha

  • Reply
?
  • Anonymous
  • NMv
  • 14 Nov 2023

Toyota had a better idea with the LFA, I think. To prevent scalpers, you could only lease the LFA for 2 years. Only after the lease was up, people could pay the residual to actually own it. But that meant for the first 2 years, owners didn...

  • Reply
  • Read all comments
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 2

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Dacia
  • Ford
  • Jeep
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Zeekr
  • Jaguar
  • Mini
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • MG
  • Voyah
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • RAM
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • All brands

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelVolkswagen
    ID.3 Neo 79 kWh
  • ModelMercedes
    EQS 580 4MATIC
  • ModelSkoda
    Peaq 90x
  • ModelBMW
    iX3 40
  • ModelBMW
    i3 50 xDrive
  • ModelTesla
    Model Y L Premium

Featured

  • Have electric cars gone power crazy? Have electric cars gone power crazy?
  • EV vs ICE - differences and similarities EV vs ICE - differences and similarities
  • EREV or Extended Range Electric Vehicle explained EREV or Extended Range Electric Vehicle explained
  • Why DC charging peak power is misleading Why DC charging peak power is misleading
  • Benefits of dedicated EV platforms Benefits of dedicated EV platforms
ADVERTISEMENTS

Reviews

  • Peugeot e-3008 GT Electric review Peugeot e-3008 GT Electric review
  • 2026 Renault 5 E-Tech review 2026 Renault 5 E-Tech review
  • Which Skoda is better - Enyaq iV or Enyaq Coupe RS iV Which Skoda is better - Enyaq iV or Enyaq Coupe RS iV
  • 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh review 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4 kWh review

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2026 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com