ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

EV charging companies request delay in Texas' Tesla NACS mandate

  • Post your comment

Max McDee, 03 July 2023

Tesla Misc

Not everyone is happy with the rapid switch to the NACS - several prominent EV charging companies are urging Texas to reconsider its plan to mandate Tesla's North American Charging Standard (NACS) in state charging stations. In a letter to the Texas Transportation Commission, companies including ChargePoint, FLO, ABB, FreeWire, and EVBox have voiced their opposition, describing the move as "premature" and warning it could disrupt the deployment of federal funds.

In the recent announcement, Texas revealed plans to require charging companies to include both Tesla's NACS and the rival Combined Charging Standard (CCS) in charging stations statewide. The decision is part of a state program aiming to electrify highways using federal funds. Following Texas' announcement, Washington unveiled similar plans, suggesting the momentum toward Tesla's NACS is growing.

EV charging companies request delay in Texas' Tesla NACS mandate

However, EV charging companies have expressed concerns about the rapid implementation of the mandate. They argued that they need more time to standardize, test, and certify the safety and interoperability of Tesla connectors across the industry. The companies, already operating Tesla's NACS at some of their charging stations, stressed the need for additional time to re-engineer several aspects of the NACS connectors. This includes lengthening the cable and ensuring suitable temperature ranges, along with procuring certifications for specific parts.

Furthermore, these companies emphasized the importance of establishing a robust supply chain for NACS cables and connectors, underlining that rushing this process could potentially lead to issues down the line. Some companies are reportedly planning to bring their concerns to the federal government soon.

EV charging companies request delay in Texas' Tesla NACS mandate

Despite the opposition, the adoption of Tesla's NACS by other car manufacturers continues to increase. Companies like Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Volvo, Polestar and Rivian Automotive have announced their adoption of NACS, while many others contemplate the adoption, fearing loss of customers if they solely offer CCS.

Tesla's Superchargers, which use the NACS, currently constitute about 60% of all fast chargers in the United States, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. This widespread usage could be one of the factors behind Texas' decision, as it allows non-Tesla users to benefit from Tesla's extensive charging network.

The controversy underscores the challenges inherent in the expanding EV industry, particularly around standardization and infrastructure development. It remains to be seen whether Texas will heed the call of the charging companies to delay the implementation of the NACS mandate or if the state will push forward with its original plan.

Via

Related articles
  • BYD leads the global EV race as Tesla slips away BYD leads the global EV race as Tesla slips away
  • Tesla’s next-gen AI chip faces big delay, creating a Cybercab problem Tesla’s next-gen AI chip faces big delay, creating a Cybercab problem
  • Tesla Robotaxi troubles grow with seven reported crashes in Austin Tesla Robotaxi troubles grow with seven reported crashes in Austin
  • Tesla and GM try and shake off Chinese parts from supply chain Tesla and GM try and shake off Chinese parts from supply chain
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 0

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Genesis
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Ford
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Jaguar
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • Mini
  • MG
  • Vinfast
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • [..]

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelPorsche
    Cayenne Turbo Electric
  • ModelJeep
    Recon
  • ModelZeekr
    001 Ultra+ 103 kWh AWD
  • ModelToyota
    Hilux BEV
  • ModelToyota
    bZ AWD Limited
  • ModelRenault
    Twingo

Featured

  • Xpeng P7 AWD quick review and drive Xpeng P7 AWD quick review and drive
  • Why electric cars don't have conventional gearboxes Why electric cars don't have conventional gearboxes
  • Comparison of NEDC, EPA and WLTP cycles Comparison of NEDC, EPA and WLTP cycles
  • Why do modern vehicles beep so much while driving? Why do modern vehicles beep so much while driving?
  • Different types of electric motors used in EVs Different types of electric motors used in EVs
ADVERTISEMENTS

Reviews

  • Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic review Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic review
  • Nissan Ariya review Nissan Ariya review
  • Mini Cooper SE JCW review Mini Cooper SE JCW review
  • Mini Countryman SE ALL4 review Mini Countryman SE ALL4 review

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2025 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com