ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

EV charging companies request delay in Texas' Tesla NACS mandate

  • Post your comment

Max McDee, 03 July 2023

Tesla Misc

Not everyone is happy with the rapid switch to the NACS - several prominent EV charging companies are urging Texas to reconsider its plan to mandate Tesla's North American Charging Standard (NACS) in state charging stations. In a letter to the Texas Transportation Commission, companies including ChargePoint, FLO, ABB, FreeWire, and EVBox have voiced their opposition, describing the move as "premature" and warning it could disrupt the deployment of federal funds.

In the recent announcement, Texas revealed plans to require charging companies to include both Tesla's NACS and the rival Combined Charging Standard (CCS) in charging stations statewide. The decision is part of a state program aiming to electrify highways using federal funds. Following Texas' announcement, Washington unveiled similar plans, suggesting the momentum toward Tesla's NACS is growing.

EV charging companies request delay in Texas' Tesla NACS mandate

However, EV charging companies have expressed concerns about the rapid implementation of the mandate. They argued that they need more time to standardize, test, and certify the safety and interoperability of Tesla connectors across the industry. The companies, already operating Tesla's NACS at some of their charging stations, stressed the need for additional time to re-engineer several aspects of the NACS connectors. This includes lengthening the cable and ensuring suitable temperature ranges, along with procuring certifications for specific parts.

Furthermore, these companies emphasized the importance of establishing a robust supply chain for NACS cables and connectors, underlining that rushing this process could potentially lead to issues down the line. Some companies are reportedly planning to bring their concerns to the federal government soon.

EV charging companies request delay in Texas' Tesla NACS mandate

Despite the opposition, the adoption of Tesla's NACS by other car manufacturers continues to increase. Companies like Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Volvo, Polestar and Rivian Automotive have announced their adoption of NACS, while many others contemplate the adoption, fearing loss of customers if they solely offer CCS.

Tesla's Superchargers, which use the NACS, currently constitute about 60% of all fast chargers in the United States, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. This widespread usage could be one of the factors behind Texas' decision, as it allows non-Tesla users to benefit from Tesla's extensive charging network.

The controversy underscores the challenges inherent in the expanding EV industry, particularly around standardization and infrastructure development. It remains to be seen whether Texas will heed the call of the charging companies to delay the implementation of the NACS mandate or if the state will push forward with its original plan.

Via

Related articles
  • Tesla rebrands FSD in China to Tesla Assisted Driving Tesla rebrands FSD in China to Tesla Assisted Driving
  • Tesla switches to subscription-only Full Self-Driving in Europe Tesla switches to subscription-only Full Self-Driving in Europe
  • Tesla expands FSD Supervised to China in hope to boost EV sales Tesla expands FSD Supervised to China in hope to boost EV sales
  • Tesla implements an undismissible feedback window when intervening FSD Tesla implements an undismissible feedback window when intervening FSD
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 0

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Dacia
  • Ford
  • Jeep
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Zeekr
  • Jaguar
  • Mini
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • MG
  • Voyah
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • RAM
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • All brands

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelAudi
    Q4 e-tron performance
  • ModelAudi
    Q4 Sportback e-tron
  • ModelBMW
    i7 LCI M70 xDrive
  • ModelHyundai
    Ioniq 3 Standard Range
  • ModelMercedes
    C400 4MATIC
  • ModelVolkswagen
    ID.3 Neo 79 kWh

Featured

  • Audi Q8 55 e-tron alternatives - BMW iX xDrive50 and Polestar 3 LR Audi Q8 55 e-tron alternatives - BMW iX xDrive50 and Polestar 3 LR
  • Why do modern vehicles beep so much while driving? Why do modern vehicles beep so much while driving?
  • VW ID.4, Audi Q4 and Skoda Enyaq - three identical yet so different EVs VW ID.4, Audi Q4 and Skoda Enyaq - three identical yet so different EVs
  • Peugeot e-208 tops 84 cars in ADAC's 2024 Ecotest, Model 3 ranks fourth Peugeot e-208 tops 84 cars in ADAC's 2024 Ecotest, Model 3 ranks fourth
  • How big is the “fuel tank” of an EV? How big is the “fuel tank” of an EV?

Reviews

  • BMW i5 M60 xDrive Touring review BMW i5 M60 xDrive Touring review
  • Dacia Spring Electric 2023 review Dacia Spring Electric 2023 review
  • Peugeot e-3008 GT Electric review Peugeot e-3008 GT Electric review
  • Volkswagen ID. Buzz Pro review Volkswagen ID. Buzz Pro review
ADVERTISEMENTS

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2026 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com