ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

EV charging companies request delay in Texas' Tesla NACS mandate

  • Post your comment

Max McDee, 03 July 2023

Tesla Misc

Not everyone is happy with the rapid switch to the NACS - several prominent EV charging companies are urging Texas to reconsider its plan to mandate Tesla's North American Charging Standard (NACS) in state charging stations. In a letter to the Texas Transportation Commission, companies including ChargePoint, FLO, ABB, FreeWire, and EVBox have voiced their opposition, describing the move as "premature" and warning it could disrupt the deployment of federal funds.

In the recent announcement, Texas revealed plans to require charging companies to include both Tesla's NACS and the rival Combined Charging Standard (CCS) in charging stations statewide. The decision is part of a state program aiming to electrify highways using federal funds. Following Texas' announcement, Washington unveiled similar plans, suggesting the momentum toward Tesla's NACS is growing.

EV charging companies request delay in Texas' Tesla NACS mandate

However, EV charging companies have expressed concerns about the rapid implementation of the mandate. They argued that they need more time to standardize, test, and certify the safety and interoperability of Tesla connectors across the industry. The companies, already operating Tesla's NACS at some of their charging stations, stressed the need for additional time to re-engineer several aspects of the NACS connectors. This includes lengthening the cable and ensuring suitable temperature ranges, along with procuring certifications for specific parts.

Furthermore, these companies emphasized the importance of establishing a robust supply chain for NACS cables and connectors, underlining that rushing this process could potentially lead to issues down the line. Some companies are reportedly planning to bring their concerns to the federal government soon.

EV charging companies request delay in Texas' Tesla NACS mandate

Despite the opposition, the adoption of Tesla's NACS by other car manufacturers continues to increase. Companies like Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Volvo, Polestar and Rivian Automotive have announced their adoption of NACS, while many others contemplate the adoption, fearing loss of customers if they solely offer CCS.

Tesla's Superchargers, which use the NACS, currently constitute about 60% of all fast chargers in the United States, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. This widespread usage could be one of the factors behind Texas' decision, as it allows non-Tesla users to benefit from Tesla's extensive charging network.

The controversy underscores the challenges inherent in the expanding EV industry, particularly around standardization and infrastructure development. It remains to be seen whether Texas will heed the call of the charging companies to delay the implementation of the NACS mandate or if the state will push forward with its original plan.

Via

Related articles
  • Tesla’s FSD Lite pushes aging Hardware3 to the boiling point Tesla’s FSD Lite pushes aging Hardware3 to the boiling point
  • Musk denies Tesla might sacrifice its best car factory to reach the stars Musk denies Tesla might sacrifice its best car factory to reach the stars
  • Tesla's record deliveries fail to shield the bottom line from Elon's AI ambitions Tesla's record deliveries fail to shield the bottom line from Elon's AI ambitions
  • Inside Tesla's redacted record crash surge Inside Tesla's redacted record crash surge
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 0

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Dacia
  • Ford
  • Jeep
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Zeekr
  • Jaguar
  • Mini
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • MG
  • Voyah
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • RAM
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • All brands

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelXiaomi
    SkyNomad N90 Max
  • ModelXiaomi
    SkyNomad N70 Pro
  • ModelMercedes
    GLA 350 4Matic
  • ModelVolkswagen
    ID.Cross 155 kW
  • ModelDS
    N°7 AWD Long Range
  • ModelMercedes
    AMG CLA 45 4Matic+

Featured

  • Why solar panels on cars make no sense (at this point) Why solar panels on cars make no sense (at this point)
  • Peugeot e-208 tops 84 cars in ADAC's 2024 Ecotest, Model 3 ranks fourth Peugeot e-208 tops 84 cars in ADAC's 2024 Ecotest, Model 3 ranks fourth
  • Grand test: Which is the fastest EV? Grand test: Which is the fastest EV?
  • Why do modern vehicles beep so much while driving? Why do modern vehicles beep so much while driving?
  • The EVs will kill the power grid. Or will they? The EVs will kill the power grid. Or will they?

Reviews

  • BMW i7 xDrive60 review BMW i7 xDrive60 review
  • Lucid Air Grand Touring review Lucid Air Grand Touring review
  • Hyundai Ioniq 9 Performance review Hyundai Ioniq 9 Performance review
  • The XPENG P7 is a low-slung speed machine that thinks like a human The XPENG P7 is a low-slung speed machine that thinks like a human
ADVERTISEMENTS

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2026 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com